I’m Now Not So Glad To Be Scottish

George Galloway

George Galloway, Assange Apologist who believes neither of the women were sexually assaulted by Assange, but instead he did things which are “bad sexual ettiquete” (Photo credit: DavidMartynHunt)

Ah, George Galloway. How much of a platform would you have had to defend Assange from if you hadn’t been on Celebrity Big Brother a few years ago, been hypnotised and made cat noises? Would you be seen as some kind of (vaguely) loveable buffoon like Boris? Or would the views you expressed in your podcast have come to light far sooner if another alleged rape case had come up in this country?

I feel I should point out my position on the Assange case (at this point I’m rather glad to be female, because my boyfriend has been called a “rape apologist” by women on twitter for telling people that presuming guilt can lead to a mistrial, and the man walking free). Obviously, I believe he should stand trial in Sweden for the crimes he is alleged to have committed in their country. Having read the statement from his own lawyer, which appeared to be a summation of the charges laid against him, the charges look pretty horrific. Particularly the charge laid by woman B, who Assange is alleged to have pinned down and pried her legs open to gain penetration into her.

However, I don’t believe the UK have any right to gain entry into the Ecuadorian Embassy to arrest Assange to extradite him to Sweden. The reason he has not answered these charges appears to be his fear of Sweden extraditing him to the USA to face trial over his Wikileaks site. If Sweden could give him some concrete answers as to his extradition, I’m of the opinion he would be there to face trial.

Anyway, this blog post isn’t about Assange. It’s about Mr Galloway, who I’m undecided as to email tonight over his viewpoints.

Now, Being Asleep Is Now Seen As Consent

Mr Galloway in his Good Night with George Galloway podcast, he defended Julian Assange, saying that as the woman had given prior consent and had sex with him prior to falling asleep, Assange was not raping the woman when he penetrated her whilst she was sleeping.

My views on this are that you are at your most vulnerable when you’re asleep, you can’t do anything to protect yourself. Galloway on the other hand, said “I mean, not everybody needs to be asked prior to each insertion.” This may be true if you’re just changing position, but come on now. During how many one night stands have you woken up to the stranger penetrating you? In my case, never. I’m sure that’s pretty much the case for most people.

A magistrates court here in the UK has said that “What is alleged here is that Mr Assange ‘deliberately consummated sexual intercourse with her by improperly exploiting that she, due to sleep, was in a helpless state’. In this country that would amount to rape.” And I’m pretty sure that in Sweden, the law is fairly similar.

In his broadcast Galloway said: “Some people believe that when you go to bed with somebody, take off your clothes, and have sex with them and then fall asleep, you’re already in the sex game with them. It might be really bad manners not to have tapped her on the shoulder and said: ‘Do you mind if I do it again?.’ It might be really sordid and bad sexual etiquette, but whatever else it is, it is not rape or you bankrupt the term rape of all meaning.”

Bankrupt the term of all meaning?! Come on to fuck. If you want a round two with someone you’ve taken to dinner and gone home with, you damn well better ask them if they fancy it. It’s not bad sexual etiquette, what is alleged is abuse of that woman’s trust. I bet she’s scared of going to sleep with a partner now in case she were to wake up to it again.

I just can’t believe that all this talk of rape, and morons defending the perpetrators (in Assange’s case, alleged perpetrator) has come up all at one time. It’s like feeding time at the idiot zoo.

 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “I’m Now Not So Glad To Be Scottish

  1. The actual international warrant was granted because Swedish police wanted to re-interview him.

    Yet it was Sweden who booted him out of the country in the first place (on the 18th October 2010).

    Then Assange says he’ll meet them in the Embassy, Scotland Yard or via videolink and they refuse.

    Meanwhile, they travel to interview a child murderer. How weird is this?

    I don’t know if he’s done anything… and neither do you.

    In fact the accusations could be entirely fictional. But the thing is that the motivation to getting him to Sweden is that they would then allow the US to issue their arrest warrant and he could face the death penalty in the US. You see, under UK law, we wouldn’t allow him to be sent without assurances to the contrary.

    The US has got a real hardon to get Assange over there because they want him to be part of their Bradley Manning case. If they can prove collusion between Manning and Assange then Manning is a traitor (not a whistleblower) and faces the death penalty. If they cannot, because Assange is otherwise engaged, then Manning is OK. Which is why his trial is being delayed and delayed… because they need Assange.

    Meanwhile, the UK Government is pretty much acting as the US State Departments bitch.

    It’s a very conflicting scenario…. isn’t it?

    Oh, and Ecuador has offered the Swedes to host the trial in their London embassy or in Ecuador under SWEDISH LAW, even handing over Assange if he’s guilty Guess what… Sweden refused. So what do you make of that?

  2. I think you’ve totally missed what I was on about in this post, Robert. Given my post was meant to be having a go at Galloway for having defended Assange in such a way, basically saying rape within marriage and relationships can’t happen.
    Also, Sweden are signed up to the European Convention of Human Rights, a point in which it says that no person can be extradited if the sentence they face is the death penalty.

    I’d suggest you read this brilliantly written piece, explaining the exact legal position concerning Assange and his potential extradition if he were to set foot outside the Ecuadorian embassy.

  3. Pingback: Nadine Dorries Has Crawled From Under Her Rock – Again! | Pixie's Mumblings

Thoughts? Comments? Questions?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s